Bamboo House
Auroville Bamboo Research Center and the Auroville Earth Institute
INTRODUCTION
The Bamboo House project was built at the Auroville Earth Institute premises in 2009, as a demonstration of earth and bamboo construction that can be used as a temporary housing unit in tropical regions. The 18.5 m² house was created to take advantage of natural ventilation and lightning.
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Techniques/Materials
The basic techniques used were wattle and daub on a bamboo frame and woven bamboo for the pivoting doors. The structure rests on a 4 pier foundation, 85 cm above ground level. The floor is made of bison panels and the roof is composed of 3 layers. A thin plastic sheet for waterproofing, a mixture of earth, coconut fiber and coconut coir and finally a 1.5 cm thick layer of lime stabilized earth.
Eucalyptus and both species of bamboo (Dendrocalamus Strictus and Pseudoxytenanthera ritcheyi) were sourced locally. Culms and nodes had to be treated against insect attack. Nodes were sanded, 3 mm diameter holes were drilled by every 2 nodes and culms were soaked in a solution of borax and boric acid. Fifty grams of each chemical were added for every liter of water. Soaking time was typically 3 days.
Later in the production process, another method was used: culms were soaked in an alum solution for 30 minutes to preserve them for 15 years.
Note: 2.5 kg of alum were used for 150 liters of water.
Bamboo (which species?) culms tend to be arched. To straighten them, the nodes were heated with a hand-held kerosene burner. The average maximum straightening achieved was 5-8 degrees.
PREFABRICATION OF CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS
1. Wall Panels
Walls panels were made using fish mouth joints for the main frame and simple holes with bamboo pegs for bracing members. To the right is a sketch illustrating the fish mouth joint and its construction.
Note: Bamboo should be positioned in the direction of its growth, with the wide ends pointing down. To form the wattle (a matrix for the daub), a panel of split bamboo was created.
|
Figure 4 Sketch of a finished fish mouth joint
Figure 5 Finished wattle and window panel
|
Trusses were put together and a very liquid mix of concrete (1:1 sand:cement) was poured into holes at the nodes where joints were made.
Note: After the first layer of plaster was laid on the ridge, the northeast corner sank down towards the main roof. To prevent movement, the top section of the truss (ridge crown) was modified to include vertical and horizontal supports.
Note: After the first layer of plaster was laid on the ridge, the northeast corner sank down towards the main roof. To prevent movement, the top section of the truss (ridge crown) was modified to include vertical and horizontal supports.
Three coats were prepared using different ratios of earth, sand, coconut fibres and fresh cow dung to obtain varying thicknesses. For structural purposes, more binder was used in the first 2 layers. Also, less fibre made the final coat smoother. The cow dung in the final coat further increased the smoothness and acted as an insect repellent.
Coat (thickness) | Earth | Sand | Coconut Fibre (compacted) | Cow Dung |
1st (3-4 cm) | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
2nd (1 cm) | 6 (12) | 1.5 (3) | 1 (2) | 0 |
3rd (1 cm) | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
CONSTRUCTION PROCESS — PRINCIPAL ELEMENTS
1. Floor
The eucalyptus floor beams and joists were connected to the pillar foundations. Tension rods were added at the bottom of each beam. All eucalyptus was coated with cashew oil to prevent insect attack. Bison board panels (12 mm) were screwed to joists and aluminum channels were placed in the floorboards. (Figures 10 and 11)
Note: Eucalyptus tends to warp. This is most apparent in cantilevered sections with little top load. Cashew oil is highly caustic when put in contact with the skin.
Note: Eucalyptus tends to warp. This is most apparent in cantilevered sections with little top load. Cashew oil is highly caustic when put in contact with the skin.
2. Posts
Large diameter (7-9 cm) bamboo culms were joined (in groups of three) to metal fixings at each corner. Additionally, they were tied together at tops. (Figures 12 and 13)
Note: Splitting can occur at the base of the culms with axial load. To avoid this, culms can be tied with rope and glued, or thin metal sheet clamps can be used. Also, here long drill bits are necessary (20 cm) to penetrate at least 2 culms fastened together.
Note: Splitting can occur at the base of the culms with axial load. To avoid this, culms can be tied with rope and glued, or thin metal sheet clamps can be used. Also, here long drill bits are necessary (20 cm) to penetrate at least 2 culms fastened together.
3. Beams
Two culms were joined with metal fasteners to form beams and then tied to the tops of the posts. (Figure 14)
Notes: Although not implemented in this house, it is advisable to fix beams to the posts by means of metal bolts inserted vertically from the last node of the post into the beam.
Notes: Although not implemented in this house, it is advisable to fix beams to the posts by means of metal bolts inserted vertically from the last node of the post into the beam.
4. Trusses and purlins
The trusses were raised and tied in place. Three people were necessary to lift, hold and tie them. The weight was roughly ~40 kg per truss. Purlins were tied to trusses. (Figure 15)
Note: Beams should be sanded or chiseled to provide a flat surface upon which the trusses can rest.
Note: Beams should be sanded or chiseled to provide a flat surface upon which the trusses can rest.
5. Rafters and Mezzanine Joists
Rafters of pakamaran (beetle nut wood) were fixed to the purlins with coconut rope at every joint. Mezzanine joists were tied to the trusses. (Figure 16)
Note: Concerning the rafters, as the spacing was only 5 cm, this was time intensive. In the future, rather than tying each intersection, one continuous rope could be used to wrap around the purlins and hold the rafters.
Note: Concerning the rafters, as the spacing was only 5 cm, this was time intensive. In the future, rather than tying each intersection, one continuous rope could be used to wrap around the purlins and hold the rafters.
6. Panels
The panels were fixed with small metal plates at the top and bottom of each panel. (Figure 17)
Note: It was very difficult to fit the panels into the structure. This was due to curving members in panel frames and the main beams above them. Often substantial material had to be chiseled of sanded off.
Note: It was very difficult to fit the panels into the structure. This was due to curving members in panel frames and the main beams above them. Often substantial material had to be chiseled of sanded off.
7. Cement in posts
Holes of 10 mm for the cement, and 3 mm for air were drilled. Cement (mix 1:1) was poured by funnel into the bottom section of each post. (Figure 18)
Note: Due to cracks along the grain of the bamboo, some culms would splay at the base. Here again, culms should be tied and glued or fixed with metal to hold the bottom together.
Note: Due to cracks along the grain of the bamboo, some culms would splay at the base. Here again, culms should be tied and glued or fixed with metal to hold the bottom together.
8. Inter-panel earth plaster
There were many gaps between the panels. Plaster (Mix #2) was applied to fill the gaps. This gave lateral structural support to the house while the roof was being done. (Figure 19)
Note: As the size of the gaps could be large (up to 15cm wide and 5 cm thick), care had to be taken to avoid cracking. In spaces larger than 7cm, a piece of split bamboo was placed in the center to divide the gap. Moreover, the plaster mix used contained very little moisture (only enough to keep it plastic) and was compacted as much as possible in the gaps.
Note: As the size of the gaps could be large (up to 15cm wide and 5 cm thick), care had to be taken to avoid cracking. In spaces larger than 7cm, a piece of split bamboo was placed in the center to divide the gap. Moreover, the plaster mix used contained very little moisture (only enough to keep it plastic) and was compacted as much as possible in the gaps.
9. Roof
Above the pakamaran (beetle nut wood), a thin (less than 1 mm) plastic sheet was laid. This plastic sheet was supposed to be the waterproofing layer of the roof. Then, a lattice of split bamboo and coconut rope was placed to stop the next layer (earth mix) from sliding down the roof. The composition of this layer was as follows: 8 coconut fibre, 8 coconut coir dust, 3 earth and 3 water (3 water as a starting reference only). Moisture content here was important to ensure cohesion. As a test, moisture should pool around fingers when the mix is compressed.
The purpose of this layer of earth-coconut layer was to weigh the plastic sheet and avoid getting damages by the UV of the sun. The roof mix was cohesive and formed a mat on which to walk when dry. The dry weight (26 kg/m², 5 cm thickness) was slightly heavy for the structure and caused around 7 cm deflection in the purlins. One extra purlin was added on each side, just above the originals. Due to the 33° angle of the roof, most water should run off, however ~15% absorption may be expected and the structure must be capable of handling this additional weight. (Figures 20 and 21)
Finally this roof was not successful as it became too heavy with the first rains. The water absorption was more than projected. The roof, gaining weight with the rain, it sacked even more and cracked some trusses. The latter had to be reinforced. Another problem was that the plastic sheet was punched by the workers, when the walked on it. Therefore the roof was finally not waterproof and leaked. It had to be covered with a tarpaulin, which avoided the roof to leak and to sack more. The roof remained like that, covered with a tarpaulin, until May 2012. During these 3 years the roof went on deforming and the trusses got much damaged. It was not possible to repair anymore these trusses and finally they were replaced by steel trusses and the roof changed for a composite system made of PVC corrugated sheets, polystyrene for insulation and plywood cladding inside. The roof was finally the critical part of this research and totally failed.
The purpose of this layer of earth-coconut layer was to weigh the plastic sheet and avoid getting damages by the UV of the sun. The roof mix was cohesive and formed a mat on which to walk when dry. The dry weight (26 kg/m², 5 cm thickness) was slightly heavy for the structure and caused around 7 cm deflection in the purlins. One extra purlin was added on each side, just above the originals. Due to the 33° angle of the roof, most water should run off, however ~15% absorption may be expected and the structure must be capable of handling this additional weight. (Figures 20 and 21)
Finally this roof was not successful as it became too heavy with the first rains. The water absorption was more than projected. The roof, gaining weight with the rain, it sacked even more and cracked some trusses. The latter had to be reinforced. Another problem was that the plastic sheet was punched by the workers, when the walked on it. Therefore the roof was finally not waterproof and leaked. It had to be covered with a tarpaulin, which avoided the roof to leak and to sack more. The roof remained like that, covered with a tarpaulin, until May 2012. During these 3 years the roof went on deforming and the trusses got much damaged. It was not possible to repair anymore these trusses and finally they were replaced by steel trusses and the roof changed for a composite system made of PVC corrugated sheets, polystyrene for insulation and plywood cladding inside. The roof was finally the critical part of this research and totally failed.
10. Wall plaster
Layer 2 was applied to wall panels. Cracks usually formed within 48 hours and were subsequently filled once or twice. The mix for filling cracks had a slightly higher sand content eg: 12:5:2 rather than 12:3:2 (Earth, sand, fibre). (Figure 22)
Note: Here too, wet mixes (with obvious water content without even squeezing) usually caused more cracking. Panels receiving direct sunlight seemed to crack more than those in the shade.
Note: Here too, wet mixes (with obvious water content without even squeezing) usually caused more cracking. Panels receiving direct sunlight seemed to crack more than those in the shade.
11. Filling culm ends with glue and straw
As insects and small rodents tend to nest in small spaces, the ends of all open culms were sealed with Fevicol and straw. (Figure 23)
12. Mezzanine
Beetle nut wood was planed to a consistent thickness and tied to the mezzanine joists with continuous ropes down each joist. (Figures 24 and 25)
Note: As joist diameters vary, the surface can be inconsistent. To remedy this, split bamboo can be placed between the beetle nut wood and smaller diameter joists.
Note: As joist diameters vary, the surface can be inconsistent. To remedy this, split bamboo can be placed between the beetle nut wood and smaller diameter joists.
13. Eaves
Bamboo was split by hand and tied with continuous ropes to beams. (Figures 26 and 27)
14. Final layers of wall plaster
Layer 3 was applied and, when dry and crack-free, 2 coats of lime wash were applied (mix 1 lime, 1 water, 125 grams Fevicol DDL for 4 kg of lime). (Figure 28)
Note: Both the final layer of earth plaster and the lime cracked after first application. Both could however be remedied with simple touch ups.
Note: Both the final layer of earth plaster and the lime cracked after first application. Both could however be remedied with simple touch ups.
15. Doors
Pivoting-sliding doors were hung, in accordance with the center of mass after all fixings and closing mechanisms were added. (Figures 29 and 30)
MATERIAL QUANTITIES
Earth mixes
Roof - Insulating earth mix
1 mix (8:8:3:3) gives 3m² at 5 cm thickness
Roof area 62 m²
20 full mixes with 15 litre buckets:
2400 litres coco fibre loosely packed
2400 litres coir dust loosely packed
900 litres earth
WallsRoof area 62 m²
20 full mixes with 15 litre buckets:
2400 litres coco fibre loosely packed
2400 litres coir dust loosely packed
900 litres earth
Layer 1 (estimate - as records were not kept during this period)
2160 litres earth
540 litres sand
360 litres coconut fibre
Layer 2 (including gap filling between panels)
4 full mixes with 15 litre buckets:
720 litres earth
180 litres sand
120 litres fibre
Layer 3 - ¾ bucket for 1 panel
2 full mixes with 15 litre buckets:
240 litres earth
30 litres sand
30 litres coconut fibre
Total Quantities (Not including last roof layer)
Earth - 4020 litres
Sand - 750 litres
Coconut fibre - 2910 litres (note: majority of quantity is based on loosely packed material)
Coconut coir dust - 2400 litres
Lime for interior wash - 12 kg
Cement for joint filling - 30 kg
Bamboo
Panels
Total bamboo for panels
8 window panels total - 136m regular diameter (~5cm), 64m small diameter (~2cm)
4 full panels - 56m
Doors
Total for 4 Doors
76 m
Main Structure
Purlins - 78 m
Beams - 47 m
Braces on Facade - 5 m
Main structural braces (in roof assembly) - 35 m
Eave - 28 m
Posts - 42 m
Terrace - 44 m
Trusses - 58 m
Roof supports - 9 m
Total Bamboo for house (excluding mats for doors and mezzanine):
678 m
Note: Quantities include dowels
Waste
Virtually no waste was incurred. 3-4 Bamboo culms (2 m length) and split bamboo pieces of <1 m (totaling to ~4m) were not used. The poles will have random uses around the institute and the small split pieces will be used by village staff for cooking.
The small quantity of left over eucalyptus has been stored and can be used for future projects, and the 3 bundles of beetle nut wood (30 pieces: 3 m length, 4 cm width) can be sold or used in the future as well.
Late stage construction notes
Borer beetle attack occurred in 3 or 4 places on the Dendrocalamus strictus, the majority being in the Pseudoxytenanthera ritcheyi window bars. This could be because of inadequate treatment, as this species is nearly solid, and it takes much longer for the chemicals to be absorbed by the vascular bundles.
To defend against these attacks, all window bars were charred with a kerosene burner. After this, a toxic chemical of unknown composition was applied. The result of these treatments was a drastic reduction in the dust produced when the insects are present in the bamboo. In some cases, as a final step, white glue was applied to cover the insect holes. This seemed to increase the effectiveness of the treatment.
Charring may be effective only temporarily as on one culm of dendrocalamus strictus, a beetle attack occurred in a node that had been burned for straightening.
To reduce beetle attacks, it is recommended that the bamboo be soaked in the boron solution (borax/boric acid) for 2 weeks rather than only 3 days.
In one case, when a beam culm was cut mid-node, it collapsed down to the position of the next node. In the future, it is recommended to place a dowel in the ends of culms.
During monsoon, mould formed on many culms in both the interior and exterior of the house. In most cases it was simply wiped off, and in severe cases, heat was applied to dry the culm. At the end of the monsoon, it had not reappeared.
COSTS IN RUPEES (2009)
The following costs reflect most, but not all of the construction.
Further labor costs will be incurred to hang doors and do touch ups on the interior finish (likely 5 man days). Also, money will be spent for both labor and materials to complete the last roof layer (cost and timing will be reported later).
Materials
Total ~132,000
Earth - 2,500
Sand - 330
Bamboo - 40,000
Steel - 23,582
Beetle nut - 7,590
Eucalyptus - 27,756 (inc. cutting charge)
Floor Panels - 9,396
Labor
Project Management team - 39,079
Earth Institute workers - 33,112
Bamboo workers - 24,540
Grand total to present - 229,478